Legislature(2025 - 2026)BARNES 124
03/25/2025 08:00 AM House COMMUNITY & REGIONAL AFFAIRS
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
Audio | Topic |
---|---|
Start | |
HB13 | |
SB50 | |
HB133 | |
Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
*+ | HB 13 | TELECONFERENCED | |
*+ | HB 133 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | SB 50 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | TELECONFERENCED |
HB 13-MUNICIPAL PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTIONS 8:04:34 AM CHAIR REBECCA HIMSCHOOT called the House Community and Regional Affairs Standing Committee meeting to order at 8:03 a.m. Representatives Ruffridge, Hall, Holland, Himschoot, and Mears were present at the call to order. Representative Prax arrived as the meeting was in progress. HB 13-MUNICIPAL PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTIONS 8:04:34 AM CO-CHAIR HIMSCHOOT announced that the first order of business would be SPONSOR SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 13, "An Act relating to optional municipal property tax exemptions for certain long-term rental units, certain mobile home parks, and real property rented to low-income families." 8:04:59 AM REPRESENTATIVE ANDREW GRAY, Alaska State Legislature, as prime sponsor, presented SSHB 13. He read from the following prepared remarks [original punctuation provided]: Thank you Co-chairs Himschoot and Mears and all members of the C&RA committee for hearing house bill 13 today. What this bill seeks to do is provide tools to municipalities for tackling a crisis in our state today that crisis is lack of housing that Alaskans can afford. Alaska has faced a sharp rise in home prices over the past decade. In 2024 state economists reported that our housing was the least affordable it had been in two decades. In my home city of Anchorage, the average price of a single-family home jumped to $524,000 this fall, a 23% increase from just 4 years ago. Add to this the increase in mortgage rates, monthly payments for an average Alaska home have nearly doubled in the past 4 years. Statewide, the average price of a new home is $423,000, which about 70% of Alaskans cannot afford. The cost of a newly constructed home in Anchorage is now $683,000, which 86% of Anchorage households cannot afford. Along with the sharp increase in home prices, Alaska has seen a sharp increase in rents. This is due to several factors. The first is that when homeownership is not affordable, many renters who previously would have exited the rental market with the purchase of a home, are unable to purchase that home. So, they remain in the rental market indefinitely. As a result, fewer units are available for young Alaskans entering the rental market for the first time. A 2024 AHFC housing survey showed that rental vacancy rates across the state remain historically low. As the pool of rental properties shrink landlords face less competition from other landlords while renters face more competition from other renters. The free market drives up rents due to increase in demand with a decrease in supply. Finally, of course, inflation also drives rents up. when landlord's operating costs rise, they pass those costs onto their renters. I think we can agree that we have experienced significant inflation over the past few years. I've identified the problem, House Bill 13 is part of the solution. This bill incentivizes more rental properties of better quality at lower cost. It does so by offering OPTIONAL PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTIONS to municipalities. Alaska municipalities decide which if any of the following options are right for them. And they have great discretion in crafting the exemptions to meet their local needs. Here are the possibilities: 1. An optional property tax exemption can be offered to landlords who transition a short-term rental property to a long-term rental property. This incentivizes Alaskan properties being leased NOT BY TOURISTS (as most short-term rentals are used for) but by Alaskans. 2. An optional property tax exemption can be offered to mobile home park owners who make major infrastructure investment in their mobile home parks. Alaska's mobile home parks are often the most affordable housing option for our lower- income families but we know that our mobile home parks are absolutely not what they used to be. This would allow municipalities to encourage major repairs inside the park. 3. An optional property tax exemption can be offered to landlords who rent to low-income families. This is self-explanatory. We want landlords who are willing to rent to low-income families without overcharging them. HB 13 would allow municipalities to reward landlords who are doing the right thing. This particular section of the bill is still having its language adjusted, and a CS should be coming forward soon. 4. Finally, number 4, An optional property tax exemption could be offered for first-time home buyers as I said in my introduction homes are very expensive, mortgages have doubled in recent years, and if we want people to be able to buy their first homes which I for one do -- we have to figure out how to help them. Those are the four different criteria that municipalities could potentially offer property tax exemptions for. The bill does one additional thing and that is it allows property tax exemptions to be offered for owner-occupied residential properties only. This aspect of the bill grew out of a recent proposal by the Anchorage Economic Development Corporation which had proposed an Anchorage sales tax that would be used in part for property tax relief passing HB 13 would allow that relief to go to residential homeowners rather than to commercial property owners which was not the intent of that proposal. 8:10:11 AM CO-CHAIR HIMSCHOOT sought questions from committee members. 8:10:29 AM CO-CHAIR MEARS shared through her experience in the Anchorage Health Department, that she had observed code violations in the water/sewer infrastructure in mobile home parks that were expensive to fix. For that reason, mobile home parks struggle to remain in compliance. She opined that making it affordable to live in these mobile home communities by bringing them up to code would be a great option. REPRESENTATIVE RUFFRIDGE shared his understanding that currently, changes to this municipal ordinance require approval by voters in an election, whereas if the bill were to pass, municipalities would be able to offer exemptions without voter ratification. 8:12:48 AM SANDRA MOLLAR, Director, Division of Community & Regional Affairs (DCRA), Department of Commerce, Community & Economic Development (DCCED), answered yes, the bill would allow municipalities to create the exemption without the existing process. REPRESENTATIVE RUFFRIDGE asserted that boroughs would not be granted the authority outlined in Section 1. CHAIR GRAY said he would want to amend the language to include boroughs. 8:14:44 AM REPRESENTATIVE RUFFRIDGE shared that the statutory definition of "dwelling unit" is a place a person sleeps and in reference to page 1, line 10, suggested that a person could take advantage of this exemption by converting a one-bedroom short-term rental to a long-term rental to get the entire house exempted. CHAIR GRAY said he would accept an amendment to the bill to correct that language. 8:17:13 AM REPRESENTATIVE HOLLAND asked why sub-subparagraph (ee) would not require first-time home buyers to occupy the residence they are purchasing. CHAIR GRAY said he would consider that as a possible amendment to ensure that people are not buying their first home and remaining renters; however, he said it is not a common issue in his community. REPRESENTATIVE HOLLAND maintained that he had seen renters buy their first home as an investment property and rent it for cash flow. He pointed out that the bill might reduce revenues from property tax at a time when municipalities are struggling financially. Additionally, if Anchorage were to grow its economy, he asked how the bill would contribute to available housing. CHAIR GRAY reiterated that no borough or municipality would be required to implement these tax exemptions. He stated that the bill was created at the request of municipalities specifically the Municipality of Anchorage (MOA) - for the purpose of incentivizing certain behavior. He spoke to population decline and the drastic decrease in new construction. He added that affordable homes are "derelict and falling apart" and advocated for measures that incentivize the availability of properties, property improvement, and the construction of new homes. 8:23:28 AM REPRESENTATIVE RUFFRIDGE pointed out that any reduction in revenue would have to be offset by implementing another form of tax or raising property taxes on eligible homeowners, which would solve one small problem while creating others. He expressed concern that the bill might have the opposite effect of its intended outcome by incentivizing property investment and short-term rentals. He also stated his concern that it would circumvent voter oversight. CHAIR GRAY addressed local control and questioned whether the state should be deciding how Anchorage makes and spends its money. He reiterated that the Anchorage Assembly passed a resolution in unanimous support of the bill. REPRESENTATIVE RUFFRIDGE speculated that the Anchorage Assembly is in support of the bill because it would give them unchecked authority [to enact property tax exemptions] without the approval of the electorate. He expressed concern that property taxes would increase for individuals who may not qualify for these exemptions, and that the assembly could do this without voter approval. 8:28:51 AM KYLE JOHANSEN, Staff, Representative Andrew Gray, Alaska State Legislature, on behalf of Representative Gray, prime sponsor, pointed out that there are 26 other instances in statute that give municipalities the direct ability to enact the exemptions beginning on page 1, line 7 of SSHB 13. 8:29:56 AM CO-CHAIR MEARS opined that explicit language is better for public process and clarity. She said one limitation on local government is that the state must allow them to act. She said the bill would add clarity and give permission for discrete economic development tools. CHAIR GRAY pointed out that municipalities can already enact these property tax exemptions in the interest of economic development without voter approval; however, they cannot provide blanket property tax relief while excluding commercial real estate, which the bill would allow for. 8:32:12 AM REPRESENTATIVE PRAX sought to confirm that there would still be public hearings on the ordinance change proposed in the bill. MR. JOHANSEN confirmed that it would go through the public process. REPRESENTATIVE PRAX opined that if the public had wanted to enact these exemptions, they would have voted for it. He shared his belief that the bill would drive people out of Anchorage. CHAIR GRAY acknowledged Representative Prax's concern, adding that the bill has been met with "joy" in other areas of the state with high property tax burdens. 8:35:43 AM REPRESENTATIVE RUFFRIDGE asked whether there would be a cap on the exemptions in the bill. CHAIR GRAY said he supports local control so much so that he would like municipalities and boroughs to set their own criteria. He reiterated that these tax exemptions would not be required. REPRESENTATIVE RUFFRIDGE expressed concern that the bill would grant authority to a small group of people and asked whether the sponsor would be amenable to, instead of exempting by ordinance in sub-subparagraph (aa), exempt by ordinance "adopted by voters at an election." He maintained his concern that the bill would set in motion an inequitable approach to government in addition to taking away people's vote on the matter. CHAIR GRAY stated that Anchorage Assembly members are elected by the citizens to make decisions in the best interest of the public. He emphasized that his intention is to incentivize the availability of higher quality rentals at a lower cost, not to provide property tax relief. 8:45:03 AM REPRESENTATIVE RUFFRIDGE asked how the bill would prevent rent from increasing. CHAIR GRAY said he was still working on crafting the right language for the low-income property tax exemption, which would apply if the monthly rent charged to a low-income family is not more than 30 percent of the median family income. For properties that are on the verge of qualifying, he explained that it would be in the landlord's best interest to drop rent by $100 to qualify for the exemption, thereby putting downward pressure on rent. 8:47:24 AM CO-CHAIR HIMSCHOOT referred to sub-subparagraph (bb) and asked what would qualify as a renovated mobile home park. CHAIR GRAY said the language is intentionally vague to allow municipalities to define major infrastructure investment. CO-CHAIR HIMSCHOOT expressed concern that a wealthy person could buy a dilapidated mobile home park and replace it with a single- family mansion. She said there needs to be solutions for upgrading mobile home parks and making the owner's investment more durable. CHAIR GRAY said the bill would not address that issue, but it's something to be considered. 8:51:07 AM REPRESENTATIVE HALL spoke to the differences in each community with regard to the housing crisis and emphasized the importance of offering numerous levers to address the home shortage. According to a 2023 Agnew Beck Consulting study, she reported that Alaska is in need of 27,500 new housing units over the next 10 years. She asked the bill sponsor to speak to the housing shortage in Anchorage. CHAIR GRAY said it's a complicated issue because there are different types of housing. In anchorage, the average single- family home costs $524,000 and the average new build is $683,000. REPRESENTATIVE HALL shared her understanding that any additional housing would be helpful due to the bottleneck in the market. CHAIR GRAY shared an anecdotal example of an apartment building complex in his district and the price of recouping building costs on new construction in Anchorage. He acknowledged that landlords are in a difficult position as well. 8:56:54 AM CO-CHAIR HIMSCHOOT announced that SSHB 13 would be held over.
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|---|---|
HB 13 Sponsor Statement version N.pdf |
HCRA 3/25/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 3/27/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/10/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/22/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/24/2025 8:00:00 AM |
HB 13 |
HB 13 version I (CS SS HB 13 (CRA)).pdf |
HCRA 3/25/2025 8:00:00 AM |
HB 13 |
HB 13 version N (SS HB 13).pdf |
HCRA 3/25/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 3/27/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/10/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/22/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/24/2025 8:00:00 AM |
HB 13 |
HB 13 version A.pdf |
HCRA 3/25/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 3/27/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/10/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/22/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/24/2025 8:00:00 AM |
HB 13 |
HB 13 Summary of Changes (version A to N to I).pdf |
HCRA 3/25/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 3/27/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/10/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/22/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/24/2025 8:00:00 AM |
HB 13 |
HB 13 Sectional Analysis version N.pdf |
HCRA 3/25/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 3/27/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/10/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/22/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/24/2025 8:00:00 AM |
HB 13 |
HB 13 Fiscal Note - DCCED-DCRA 3.21.25.pdf |
HCRA 3/25/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 3/27/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/10/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/24/2025 8:00:00 AM |
HB 13 |
HB 13 Additional Documents-Anchorage Assembly Feb 2025 Resolution of Support.pdf |
HCRA 3/25/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 3/27/2025 8:00:00 AM |
HB 13 |
HB 13 Additional Documents-Dwelling Unit Definition.pdf |
HCRA 3/25/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 3/27/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/10/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/22/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/24/2025 8:00:00 AM |
HB 13 |
HB 13 Additional Documents-Federal low-income family definition and Link.pdf |
HCRA 3/25/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 3/27/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/10/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/22/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/24/2025 8:00:00 AM |
HB 13 |
HB 133 Sponsor Statement - Version G.pdf |
HCRA 3/25/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 3/27/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/3/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/8/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/10/2025 8:00:00 AM |
HB 133 |
HB 133 - Version G 3.8.25.pdf |
HCRA 3/25/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 3/27/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/3/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/8/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/10/2025 8:00:00 AM |
HB 133 |
HB 133 Sectional Analysis - Version G.pdf |
HCRA 3/25/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 3/27/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/3/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/8/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/10/2025 8:00:00 AM |
HB 133 |
HB 133 Fiscal Note - DOA-OPPM 3.21.25.pdf |
HCRA 3/25/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 3/27/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/3/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/8/2025 8:00:00 AM |
HB 133 |
HB 133 Testimony - Received by 3.24.25.pdf |
HCRA 3/25/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/3/2025 8:00:00 AM |
HB 133 |
SB 50 Sponsor Statement version I.pdf |
HCRA 3/25/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/1/2025 8:00:00 AM |
SB 50 |
SB 50 Version I 3.10.25.pdf |
HCRA 3/25/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/1/2025 8:00:00 AM |
SB 50 |
SB 50 version N SCRA CS.pdf |
HCRA 3/25/2025 8:00:00 AM |
SB 50 |
SB 50 version A.pdf |
HCRA 3/25/2025 8:00:00 AM |
SB 50 |
SB 50 Explanation of Changes version A to version I.pdf |
HCRA 3/25/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/1/2025 8:00:00 AM |
SB 50 |
SB 50 Sectional Analysis version I.pdf |
HCRA 3/25/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/1/2025 8:00:00 AM |
SB 50 |
SB 50 Testimony - Received as of 3.24.25.pdf |
HCRA 3/25/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/1/2025 8:00:00 AM |
SB 50 |
HB 133 Research - Impact of Delayed Payment.pdf |
HCRA 3/25/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 3/27/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/3/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/8/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/10/2025 8:00:00 AM |
HB 133 |
HB 133 Testimony - Prompt Payment Resolution -FINAL 3.25.25.pdf |
HCRA 3/25/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/3/2025 8:00:00 AM |
HB 133 |
HB 13 Additional Documents-Girdwood Valley Service Area Board of Supervisors Letter of Support.pdf |
HCRA 3/25/2025 8:00:00 AM |
HB 13 |
HB 13 Additional Documents-Anchorage Bill of Rights.pdf |
HCRA 3/25/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/10/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/22/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/24/2025 8:00:00 AM |
HB 13 |